NMI Holdings (NMIH) Q4 2025 earnings review

Volume Accelerates, Earnings Compress

NMI Holdings delivered a mixed Q4. Top-line performance was robust, with New Insurance Written (NIW) accelerating to a record $14.2 billion (+19% YoY). However, this volume growth did not translate into immediate earnings momentum. Adjusted Net Income declined sequentially for the third straight quarter ($93.8M vs $95.7M in Q3) as credit normalization took hold—the loss ratio climbed to 13.9%, and expenses ticked up. Despite the earnings compression, book value compounding remains a standout, with Adjusted Book Value per Share growing 16% YoY.

🐂 Bull Case

Business Volume Surge

New Insurance Written (NIW) accelerated significantly to $14.2B, up 19% YoY and 9% sequentially. This marks the highest volume in recent quarters, driving Insurance-in-Force (IIF) to a record $221.4B.

Consistent Value Creation

Despite margin headwinds, the book value compounding engine is intact. Adjusted Book Value per Share rose 16% YoY to $34.58, supported by active share repurchases (diluted share count down ~3% YoY).

🐻 Bear Case

Credit Deterioration

The credit environment is normalizing rapidly. The loss ratio deteriorated to 13.9% from 12.3% in Q3 and just 3.0% in Q1. Claims expenses rose 23% YoY, and the default rate ticked up to 1.12%.

Expense Pressure

Operational efficiency took a step back. The expense ratio rose sequentially to 20.4% from 19.3% in Q3, contributing to the sequential decline in net income.

⚖️ Verdict: ⚪

Neutral. The acceleration in new business volume is a strong leading indicator, but the sequential erosion in earnings power due to rising credit costs and expenses demands caution. The 16% book value growth offers a solid floor.

Key Themes

DRIVER 🟢🟢

NIW Acceleration

New business volume is accelerating sharply, defying broader housing market stagnation concerns. NIW grew from $9.2B in Q1 to $14.2B in Q4, a clear trajectory of market share gains or improved demand.

CONCERN ⚪

Loss Ratio Normalization

The era of benign credit is ending. The loss ratio has steadily climbed throughout FY25, moving from 3.0% in Q1 to 13.9% in Q4. While 13.9% is historically manageable, the velocity of the increase suggests headwinds for 2026 earnings growth.

DRIVER 🟢

Book Value Compounding

NMIH continues to generate steady shareholder value. Adjusted Book Value per Share grew 16% YoY to $34.58. Even with earnings compression, the ROE of ~14.8% supports continued double-digit book value expansion.

CONCERN NEW ⚪

Rising Default Inventory

The number of loans in default rose to 7,661, up 15% from 6,642 a year ago. The default rate increased to 1.12%, signaling that the portfolio is seeing increased stress as vintages season.

THEME 🔴

Capital Return

The company continues to shrink its float. Diluted weighted average shares outstanding dropped to 78.2 million from 80.6 million a year ago (-3%), providing a tailwind to EPS.

Other KPIs

Primary Insurance-in-Force (IIF) $221.4 Billion

Stable. Up 5% YoY and 1% QoQ. The growth in IIF provides a growing base for premium revenue, though it lags the rapid acceleration seen in NIW due to portfolio runoff.

Adjusted Diluted EPS $1.20

Decelerating. While up 12% YoY, EPS was virtually flat vs Q3 ($1.21) and down from the peak of $1.28 in Q1, reflecting the margin squeeze from higher claims.

Expense Ratio 20.4%

Reversing. After hitting a low of 19.3% in Q3, the expense ratio ticked back up above 20%. While lower than the 21.7% seen a year ago, the sequential rise added to margin pressure.

Key Questions

Loss Ratio Ceiling

With the loss ratio climbing from 3% to nearly 14% in one year, where does management see this metric stabilizing in FY26? Are we approaching a peak, or is this a return to a structurally higher norm?

NIW Drivers

Q4 NIW growth of 19% was impressive. Was this driven by specific market share gains, pricing actions, or broader market activity, and is this $14B+ quarterly run-rate sustainable?

Expense Trajectory

After a record low expense ratio in Q3, Q4 saw a significant tick up. Was Q3 an anomaly, and should we model ~20.5% as the baseline going forward?