CN (CNI) Q1 2026 earnings review

Operational Fluidity Masks Yield and Margin Degradation

CN delivered record first-quarter volumes with RTMs up 3%, but the top-line failed to follow. Revenue fell 1% as a negative mix shift, FX headwinds, and the elimination of the Canadian carbon tax dragged freight revenue per RTM down 3%. Despite achieving its best Q1 employee productivity in five years and a record fuel efficiency rate, operating expenses rose 1% due to harsh winter weather costs and advisory fees. This caused the adjusted operating ratio to deteriorate by 80 bps to 64.2% and adjusted EPS to decline 3% YoY to C$1.80. Free cash flow was a massive bright spot, surging 44% to C$900M and funding aggressive share buybacks, but the core business faces ongoing industrial macro headwinds.

๐Ÿ‚ Bull Case

Unlocking Free Cash Flow

A C$500M planned reduction in 2026 CapEx is already paying dividends. Free cash flow skyrocketed 44% YoY to C$900M, allowing CN to aggressively execute its new NCIB with C$869M in Q1 share repurchases.

Network Fluidity Recovering

Despite a harsh winter, the network performed exceptionally well. Car velocity jumped 6% to 201 miles per day, and through dwell dropped 4%, proving the structural resilience of the operations.

๐Ÿป Bear Case

Yield Compression

Freight revenue per RTM fell 3% (6.90 cents vs 7.14 cents). Volume growth is being driven by lower-yielding, long-haul segments like Grain, while high-margin merchandise categories are contracting.

Margin Contraction

Adjusted operating ratio worsened by 80 bps to 64.2%. If the volume gains cannot outpace the negative mix and inflationary wage pressures, operating income will continue to decline.

โš–๏ธ Verdict: โšช

Neutral. The operational turnaround and massive free cash flow generation are highly encouraging. However, top-line yield compression and persistent weakness in the industrial economy cap near-term earnings potential.

Key Themes

CONCERNNEW๐Ÿ”ด

Yield Compression and Negative Mix

A specific data point contradicts the positive volume narrative: despite a 3% increase in total RTMs, adjusted EPS fell 3%. The culprit is yield compression. Freight revenue per RTM dropped 3% YoY to 6.90 cents. Negative mix shift is heavily to blame, as lower-yielding, long-haul segments like Grain (+13% RTMs) grew rapidly, while higher-yielding merchandise like Forest Products (-9% RTMs) shrank.

CONCERN๐Ÿ”ด

Industrial Economy Laggards

The broader macroeconomic weakness in North American industrial production continues to severely drag on CN's high-margin segments. Forest Products (-12% Revenue), Metals & Minerals (-11% Revenue), and Coal (-11% Revenue) posted double-digit declines. Metals were explicitly hit by lower frac sand shipments due to reduced drilling in Western Canada, while Forest Products face ongoing U.S. anti-dumping duties.

CONCERNNEW๐Ÿ”ด

Margin Degradation and Advisory Costs

Adjusted OR worsened 80 bps to 64.2%. Purchased services jumped 8% to C$623M, driven not only by snow clearing but also C$17M in advisory costs related to rail consolidation matters (likely ongoing UP/NS merger advocacy). This indicates that external legal and weather costs are heavily pressuring the bottom line.

DRIVERNEW๐ŸŸข

Operational Fluidity and Efficiency

The network absorbed winter disruptions significantly better than in recent years. Car velocity increased 6% to 201 miles/day, through network train speed increased 6% to 18.7 mph, and fuel efficiency hit a Q1 record of 0.892 gallons per 1,000 GTMs (3% more efficient). This operational leverage is keeping the network ready for a broader volume recovery.

DRIVER๐ŸŸข

Prince Rupert Gateway Securing Intermodal Growth

Intermodal revenues grew 2% on 4% higher RTMs, specifically driven by higher international shipments through the Port of Prince Rupert. This validates previous investments and strategic innovations like the Gemini Alliance, allowing CN to bypass congested West Coast ports and offer a highly reliable transcontinental alternative.

DRIVERNEW๐ŸŸข

Right-Sizing Headcount to Protect Cash

Average employee count decreased 4.4% YoY (23,554 from 24,627). This disciplined resource management allowed labor and fringe benefits to decrease 1% to C$914M despite general wage increases, generating the best Q1 GTMs per employee productivity in five years (+8%).

Other KPIs

Free Cash Flow (26Q1)C$900 million

Accelerating. Jumped 44% YoY from C$626 million in 25Q1, driven by a 9% increase in operating cash flow and a 32% reduction in investing activities (CapEx). This massive cash generation easily funded the C$869M spent on share repurchases in the quarter.

Adjusted Operating Income (26Q1)C$1,566 million

Decelerating. Dropped 3% YoY. The negative operating leverage is evident as a 3% increase in RTM workload resulted in lower operating profits, highlighting the damaging impact of negative revenue mix and yield compression.

Guidance

FY26 Volume (RTM) GrowthFlattish

Stable. Management maintained their base case of 'flattish' volumes for the year. This reflects the ongoing mixed environment where strong grain and intermodal are offset by persistent weakness in industrial segments like forest products and metals.

FY26 Adjusted Diluted EPS GrowthSlightly exceed volume growth

Stable. Reaffirmed the cautious directional guidance. With Q1 adjusted EPS down 3%, the company will rely heavily on the C$869M in aggressive Q1 share repurchases and massive free cash flow generation to mathematically lift full-year EPS ahead of flat volumes.

FY26 Capital Program~C$2.8 billion

Stable. Unchanged from the Q4 guidance update, reflecting a structural step-down from the ~C$3.4 billion spent in recent years. This capital discipline is the primary engine behind the 44% surge in Q1 free cash flow.

Key Questions

Core Pricing Power

You achieved record Q1 volumes but saw a 3% drop in freight revenue per RTM. Excluding the carbon tax and FX impacts, what is the underlying core pricing trend, and are negative mix shifts becoming structural?

Expense Normalization

Purchased services were up 8% largely due to winter costs and advisory fees. Looking at the rest of 2026, do you expect these expense lines to normalize and provide a tailwind for the operating ratio?

Industrial Economy Turnaround

The U.S./Canada industrial economy continues to drag on Forest Products and Metals. What specific macro indicators would you need to see to turn more constructive on these high-margin segments?